Breaking Barriers: Addressing Systemic Inequities in Gifted Education
Gifted education programs help to nurture exceptional talent, but systematic biases often exclude marginalized students.
BRYNN LEE
Girl enjoys learning and doing some homework, Shutterstock 2013
Gifted programs have cultivated exceptional students since the 1950s, providing talented individuals with a personalized environment to grow and excel. However, in 21st century education, inequitable access to these programs, which often stems from systematic barriers in the screening and identification process has become an increasing problem. Many students from marginalized groups—especially those from low-income families, racial minorities, and underrepresented communities—are often overlooked or excluded from gifted programs.
Systematic Issues in Gifted Screening
One of the main problems with gifted programs remains the identification of gifted students through standardized tests or teacher recommendations. While these methods can be effective, they are susceptible to biases that under-represent the amount of minority students in gifted programs.
Cultural Bias in Standardized Testing
Standardized testing (like the SAT, ACT, and IQ tests - COGNAT)is one of the most common tools used for identifying gifted students as it is inexpensive and often administered in one setting. Many standardized tests continue to disadvantage students from different cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. For example, tests are often designed with a specific cultural society in mind, which may not reflect the experiences or knowledge of students from minority groups. A 2018 study by the National Bureau of Labor Statistics found that the use of standardized testing alone leads to the underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic students in gifted programs. Because their cultural background and prior experiences may not align with the test content, these students often perform worse compared to their peers of other races.
Teacher Recommendations and Implicit Bias
Teacher recommendations are another method used to identify gifted students. However, teachers' recommendations can be influenced by implicit biases. For instance, teachers may unconsciously overlook the potential giftedness of students who do not display the traditional characteristics of giftedness, such as outgoing behavior or conventional academic performance. Many students’ behaviors are also influenced by their cultures which may not align with teachers’ perceptions of giftedness. A 2020 study by the U.S. Department of Education found that Black and Latino students were less likely to be recommended for gifted programs, even when their academic performance was comparable to their White and Asian peers. This reliance on teacher recommendations leaves room for lack of acknowledgment disproportionate to minority groups. There are no rigid characteristics for giftedness which leaves identification of potentially gifted children in a grey space. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Gifted Education and Equity Study conducted a study on the impact of testing on gifted education and found that low-income students who would likely qualify for gifted programs are not being identified because standardized tests do not fully capture the breadth of giftedness. The NBER recommends using multiple methods of assessment, including portfolio assessments, interviews, and teacher observations, to ensure a more equitable identification process for gifted students.
Lack of Universal Screening
Many school districts do not offer universal screening for gifted programs, meaning that only students nominated by teachers or parents are assessed for giftedness. This system tends to favor students who have strong advocates, leading students without advocates falling behind and becoming lost. Universal screening, where all students are evaluated for giftedness, could reduce biases in the screening process and ensure that every student has a fair chance at being considered for gifted programs. This process additionally helps students and families who may initially be unaware that gifted programs exist in their schools, bridging the gap and allowing for more opportunities for these often-overlooked students.
Barriers to Accessing Gifted Programs
Even when students are identified as gifted, there are still significant roadblocks preventing them from accessing gifted programs. These barriers often include geographic, socioeconomic, and systemic factors that disproportionately affect low-income and minority students.
Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities
The availability of gifted programs varies depending on the resources of the school district and area surrounding it. Wealthier districts tend to offer more robust and well-funded gifted programs, while schools in low-income areas may lack the resources to provide these opportunities as many public schools are dependent on tax funds from properties. A study by the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation found that students in districts with lower funding had limited access to advanced coursework or enrichment programs, even when they were identified as gifted. At the high school level, fewer advanced math and science courses are available in schools whose population is 75% or more Black or Hispanic than in schools whose population is 25% or less Black or Hispanic.
Underrepresentation of Minority Students
Even in districts that offer gifted programs, there is often a significant underrepresentation of Black, Hispanic, and Native American students. According to the University of Connecticut, Black and Hispanic students are consistently underrepresented in gifted programs across the United States, despite having comparable academic achievement to their White peers. Black and Hispanic students make up only 28% of students enrolled in gifted and talented programs, despite making up 42% of students in schools that offer gifted and talented programs. Another independent study by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) noted that African American and Latino students are disproportionately underrepresented in gifted programs, even in schools that serve large minority populations, underscoring the need for more inclusive identification practices and greater efforts to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in gifted education.
To address the inequities in gifted education and the screening system, universal screening must be implemented to ensure that all students, not just those nominated by teachers or parents, are evaluated for giftedness. Schools should expand identification methods by using a variety of tools, such as performance-based assessments, teacher evaluations, and peer nominations, to create a more comprehensive identification process beyond just standardized tests. By taking a more holistic approach, gifted students can be identified in unique ways, not just ways that fit a specific cultural society. Additionally, policymakers should increase funding to underserved areas, ensuring that gifted programs are accessible to students in low-income districts and giving all students, regardless of socioeconomic status, the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Gifted programs are essential for fostering the talents of exceptional students, yet systemic biases in screening and access continue to prevent many deserving students from benefiting from these opportunities. By implementing universal screening, expanding identification methods, addressing implicit biases, and increasing access to underserved students, we can create a more equitable system that allows all students, regardless of their background, to reach their full potential.
Saphron Initiative staff and guest contributors often express their views in pieces on Edisco. These pieces do not constitute an organizational endorsement of the viewpoints within. Our goal is to encourage and uplift student voices and we respect diverse opinions. We encourage all readers to conduct further research and develop informed opinions on the issues discussed.
